Gregory Porter – “Be Good (Lion’s Song)”

May 19, 2013

 

Today’s video is from Gregory Porter performing a song from his 2012 release Be Good.  Recorded live in a vintage NYC subway car at the New York Transit Museum, Porter displays all the soulful warmth found on the album.  Accompanied by pianist Chip Crawford, Porter sings the tune “Be Good (Lion’s Song).”

Your video personnel:  Gregory Porter (vocals) and Chip Crawford (piano).

 

 

Gregory Porter - "Be Good"Very soon, I’ll be posting a review of the album, but if you just can’t wait for my magical words of persuasion to tempt you into purchasing the album, here’s a few retail links to help you out now:

Available at eMusic.  Available at Amazon: CD | MP3

And some additional video credits:

Thanks to WBGO.org and NPR Music for the video.

Produced by Saidah Blount, Mito Habe-Evans and Patrick Jarenwattananon; Videographers: Gabriella Garcia-Pardo, Mito Habe-Evans, Tim Wilkins; Audio engineered by Kevin Wait; Video edited by Gabriella Garcia-Pardo and Mito Habe-Evans.



Like Stone, Like Smoke: Pascal Le Boeuf – “Pascal’s Triangle” & “Remixed”

May 17, 2013

 

Pascal Le Boeuf has just released a pair of interesting new recordings that, individually, hold their own each as solid performances, but it’s how they work as points of comparison, as poles of complementary function and point of view that provides the real intrigue.

Pascal Le Boeuf - "Pascal's Triangle"Pascal’s Triangle is a nice modern piano trio recording.  With Linda Oh on bass and Justin Brown on drums, pianist Le Boeuf sets a course on piano that relishes skipping over choppy waves at high speed while kicking out some decent melodies along the way.

Some tracks, like album opener “Home In Strange Places,” start out with a light touch before developing into something fuller and stronger, yet still recognizable as the seed from whence the song blossomed.  And then there are tracks like “Variations On a Mood,” which begin at a brisk pace which catapults the song into pounding rhythmic interludes.

Not unlike the trio projects of Brad Mehldau, Le Boeuf’s trio maintains a snappy, unhurried tempo, and melodic development that sounds effortlessly streamlined, fluid.  Le Boeuf’s trio sets an anchor in the middle of modern Jazz waters.  It’s the kind of thing that sends out ripples to draw others closer.

It’s also vastly different from the mutable presence of his other new release, Remixed.

Le Boeuf Brothers - "Remixed"With the general premise of giving jazz musicians an opportunity to let loose their inner-DJ, Pascal and his brother Remy (the Le Boeuf Brothers) invited David Binney, Tim Lefebvre, Jochen Rueckert, Kissy Girls, Lucky Luke & Armand Hirsch to into the studio to go about the challenge of remixing tracks from the Le Boeuf Brothers 2011 release In Praise of Shadows… itself an intriguing example of how jazz musicians are using technology and the influence of modern music as part of their own repertoire.

It’s nowhere even remotely near the center of Jazz waters.  And the ripples it sends out go off into new territories, never to return, and in some cases, attracts followers along the way.

The thing of it is, while the electric Remixed is, at most, an ethereal companion to the solid rock foundation of Pascal’s Triangle‘s piano trio, it’s a logical next step from In Praise of Shadows.  The blips and buzzes of the remixed “Red Velvet” may differentiate it from the original, but they still share the same essential bright notes and warm enthusiasm.  The remixed version of “For Every Kiss” makes more of a home for the crooner, and the keyboards dig in a bit deeper, but both versions possess the dramatic builds and crashes that reflect the heart of the song.  On the remix, “Fire Dancing” lays on the drum & bass far thicker than the original, but in both versions, it’s still all about the beat… a quality further accentuated on the original version by the spry tenor sax dancing circles around the rhythm.

Or how about “Calgary Clouds,”

Which, when remixed, becomes a boiling cauldron of percussion and effects…

And though In Praise of Shadows is a Jazz album, it was sticking its beak into waters that featured the harmonic layering of a Radiohead, the pop-ambient electronica of Air, the thumping beats of drum ‘n bass outfits, the shimmering warped vocals of trip-hop, the blips, buzzes, and melodic glides of any number of straight-up electronica acts, and the mixing and production tricks of all those arenas.  Remixed is just a fuller realization of those experiments presented on In Praise of Shadows.  It’s almost natural.

It’s also a world away from Pascal’s Triangle.

But a world is such a small measure of expanse in the mind of an artist.  Universes, often, aren’t enough to encapsulate all the creative thoughts bouncing around inside their heads.  It’s a big reason why I enjoy how Remixed behaves as an interesting part of the whole picture… more than I even enjoy it simply as a music recording.  There’s the medium, and then there’s the vision which inspired it.  It’s not required to enjoy both elements of a creative piece, but it sure does make it a lot more fun and engaging.  That’s what we have here.

Both Pascal’s Triangle & Remixed released on the Nineteen-Eight Records label.

Jazz from NYC.

Pascal’s Triangle will be released on May 28, 2013.  You can pre-order the MP3 album on the artist’s bandcamp page.  I’ll provide links to retailers when available.

Remixed:  Available to stream (and purchase) at the artist’s Bandcamp page.  Also, available at eMusic, available at Amazon: CD | MP3

*****

Le Boeuf Brothers - "In Praise of Shadows"And, if you’re interested in checking out In Praise of Shadows

Available to stream (and purchase) at the artist’s Bandcamp page.

Also, available at eMusic, available at Amazon: CD | MP3



My new Jazz Picks are up at eMusic

May 15, 2013

 

As most of you are aware, I write a weekly column for eMusic.com that gives a rundown of the best of the new Jazz releases each week (my Jazz Picks).

Anyways, they’ve just been posted up on the eMusic site HERE.

Notable albums from this week’s article are:

Christian McBride - "People Music"Joe Locke - "Lay Down My Heart"Gunhild Seim - "Story Water"Kenny Werner - "Collaboration"

 

 

 

 

… and a bunch of other recs.  Fourteen in total this week.  Lots of good stuff for the straight-ahead jazz fan.

Enjoy!



Ernst Reijseger, Harmen Fraanje, & Mola Sylla – “Down Deep”

May 13, 2013

 

Codona - "Codona 3"I remember the first time I heard the Codona trio.  I was at Jerry’s Record Exchange, flipping through the CD racks, and noticed the album cover for Codona III.  I was very familiar with Don Cherry’s name, but Collin Walcott and Nana Vasconcelos… not so much.  I hadn’t really delved much into the ECM catalog at this point (of which this album was released on), and so wasn’t sure what to expect from these musicians or this release.  My experience with Cherry was his avant-garde music on Blue Note and his work with John Coltrane.  It didn’t prepare for the organic beauty of Codona.

An early example of what is generally referred to as World Jazz, Codona released three albums of stunning, devastatingly beautiful music that is terrifically engaging with its use of instrumentation and adoption of various regional musics.  Jazz and folk and ambient… music to just drift off to, but never threatens to become sleepy or insubstantial.  It featured albums like trumpet, sitar, tabla, organ, berimbau, sanza, dulcimer, chanting, and a variety of other stringed and percussive instruments.  Texture after texture, waves of unexpected eccentricities.  Just beautiful.

Ernst Reijseger - "Deep Down"Which brings me to Deep Down, the recording by the trio of Ernst Reijseger, Harmen Fraanje, and Mola Sylla.  Bringing together inventive combinations of unusual instruments, and blending different music influences into a singular sound, the trio has created a magical album of sublime beauty.  And, damn, it takes me back to that fortuitous day in Denver, Colorado, when I discovered Codona III, and the type of Jazz that ignores conventions and genre demarcations in the pursuit of creative music.

Your album personnel:  Ernst Reijseger (cello, voice), Harmen Fraanje (piano, voice), and Mola Sylla (vocals, M’bira, Xalam, Kongoma).

Atmospheric only describes one element of this music.  It possesses a lightness that keeps it hovering just above the ground.  It’s also a music in motion, though rarely traveling very far to exert it.  Fraanje’s piano often runs in tight circles, developing melodies with a methodical precision.  Sylla brings a rustic character to the music, whether plucking at the tinny m’bira or the soothing xalam.  The elegance provided by Reijseger’s cello is exceeded only by its warm tone.  Sylla’s vocals range between a folksy chant and a plaintive cry to the heavens.

Most tunes have an ambling cadence.  There is a sense of music developing at just the right speed, the musicians guiding the song as the song, concurrently, guides them.  Sometimes the music prowls, sometimes it glides, but always with a casual demeanor that incites only blissful moments.

One of the most beautiful albums I’ve heard so far in 2013.

Released on the Winter & Winter label.

Available at eMusic.  Available at Amazon: CD | MP3 | Vinyl



Open Letter: Pitching an Album Review Request

May 11, 2013

 

BitW square avatarSo, every now and then I write a little Open Letters column, usually a mix of helpful advice and related rant material.  The source of these letters accumulates as I go about my daily routine as a music columnist, reviewer, and music site dude.  I run into things that either rub me the right or wrong way.  I try to offer some advice on how to avoid the bad things, accentuate the good, all in the hope that it helps artists and labels and PR reps and writers go about the Business Of Being An Artist.

These columns are in no means definitive.  I learn things the more I run this site and write reviews for other sites.  I gain additional insights, and I share them at random times.

My opinions and advice may or may not be applicable to other writers.  But I think most of the points I make have a certain universal cache that will translate to situations other than Bird is the Worm stuff.

So, here’s a new edition of Stuff You Should Think About Doing.  Let’s begin…

So, you want me to review your album?  You’re a musician, label, or PR rep.  You find my email on my About Me page.  Here’s what a great email would contain:

-An informative, but succinct Subject line.  Amazing to me how poorly used the Subject line of an email is.  What you need to understand is that I’m getting anywhere between 20 and 50 emails a day.  Not all of them are review requests.  Many are about upcoming shows, video releases, industry news… all kinds of music related stuff.  But your email is going to be in that crowd.  I’m more likely to notice it if it has the following items in the Subject line:

  • The phrase “Review Request”
  • Artist name
  • Album name

That’s it.  It gives me just enough to know what’s there, without it getting to be so much that my eyes glaze over.  I’ll notice it the day it hits my inbox, but even more importantly, I’ll notice it a week later, a month later, any time down the road.  It is a supreme challenge to stay organized while keeping up with all the work.  Having the Subject line of “Review Request:  John Artist – “Awesome Album Title” means that I’ll be able to slot the email where it needs to go and it’ll catch my eye down the road if I need to gather it up later.  The sheer volume of emails I receive guarantees that some will fall through the cracks.  A good simple subject line will help mitigate that risk.

-An introductory paragraph.  It doesn’t have to be too in depth.  Some writers/site owners will want you to state why you picked them in particular.  It’s a good thing to research who you’re approaching.  With me, however, I’m covering modern jazz.  As long as your album is a new release and it’s somehow related to Jazz, then you’re in.  Tell me briefly about why you’re contacting me.  Ultimately, this intro paragraph is simply an expanded version of your email’s Subject line.

-Now, about your music.  You should provide two links.

-The first link sends me to a place I can stream your album.  A Soundcloud page, a Bandcamp site, your own site which has its own audio player… somewhere I can hear as much of your album as I need to in order to determine whether I might be interested in reviewing it.  If you send me to a CDBaby or Amazon site, I close out of your email and move on to the next one.  If you send me to a MySpace page, I pray that I don’t get another virus from that damnass site, and then curse you for sending me there… and then move on to the next email.  If you send me to your site and it only plays 60 second song samples, then I move on to the next email.  Let me hear it all.  It gives me a better sense of whether I’ll make a spot for you in my schedule, and the more I can hear of your music, the more you’re giving me a chance to fall for your recording.

-The second link should give me a place I can download the album from immediately.  It doesn’t matter whether it’s a private Soundcloud page, a Bandcamp page with a provided comp download code or a Dropbox page.  But if I like what I hear from your first link, the sooner I’m able to download that album onto my computer and put it in my review queue, the better your chances at getting a review.  If I have to email you back and say, yes, I’d like to review your album, the more you’re risking that it doesn’t happen.  I’m not always able to respond to emails requesting a review copy.

And even though I tag your email with a follow-up symbol to get back to it later, it’s no guarantee that I will.  I’m dealing with huge volumes of requests.  The less time I have to spend going back and forth, and the more I can do in any one sitting, the better your chances at getting a review.  And don’t let those links expire.  I’m not always able to get to a review request email the day you send it.  Sometimes it’s not for weeks until I get to your email.  There have been several times that I’ve followed a link to listen to music or download it, just to receive an error message that the link has expired.  I try to follow up to request that the expiration date gets fixed, but that’s no guarantee.  Often, I just move on to the next album.

-What about CDs?  Different reviewers are going to have different requirements when it comes to the physical product.  Me, I prefer getting the actual CD, but I don’t frown on a digital promo copy of the album.  Sometimes I even prefer the digital copy.  I promise that I won’t look down upon you or de-prioritize your album because you’re doing digital promos only.

For a variety of reasons specific to me, your chances of getting a review are increased if I have a physical CD lying around the house… especially if I’ve taken a pass on your album the first time around.  Basically I have a slush pile, a Shelf Of Interminable Waiting, for those albums that I keep in sight just in case I feel like giving an album a second chance.  Every now and then a spot on my review schedule opens up, and I need something fast, and the first place I look is that slush pile shelf.  There have been actual reviews that have resulted from this shelf.  It doesn’t happen often, but if you’re not an established artist and you feel strongly about having me review your album for my site, then mention in your review request email that you’d like to send a physical CD and request my postal address.

I’ll re-emphasize that getting me a physical CD is not required to get a review on my site, but there’s no doubting that something about how I’m wired means I’ll notice CDs sitting on a shelf more than I noticed line items in an iTunes library.  So take that for what it’s worth.  Also, sometimes I’ll just simply ask you to send me a physical copy.  Some combination of variables like the type of music presented, my travel schedule, and my tech situation requires me to have a CD promo.  For instance, as I type this, with my hard drive full and my iPod not working, and faced with a daily two hour round-trip commute, it’s the musicians who have sent me CD promos are getting more heard than those I’ve downloaded.  But that kind of thing changes (for instance, I’m waiting for a new external hard drive to arrive, so that’ll help with that).  I mention all of this just to provide you with as much information as I can… not all of it is timely or useful in all scenarios.

-Don’t forget to attach a PDF of your one-sheet.  You’ve probably developed a one-sheet for your album… basically a promotional version of your liner notes.  It’s something that tells me about the artist, the album being promoted, past albums and projects the artist has been associated with, and anything else that seems relevant to getting me to know more about you and your music.  Typically, it should all fit on one page, though I’ve never thought poorly of one-sheets that, actually, went on for two pages.  Your music is your most effective communicator and reflects your best chance at receiving an album review, but it won’t hurt for there to be a story behind the music.

I’m a sucker for a good story, and sometimes when I’m on the fence about reviewing an album, a good back-story will be the little nudge to get me to review an album.  Don’t manufacture a story.  If a good story naturally exists, then great, but if the one-sheet is simply a “this is my music” type of thing, there’s nothing wrong with that.  Run with it.  Like I said, ultimately, it’s the music that matters most.

If you paste the one-sheet in the body of the email, there’s nothing wrong with that.

Other things to include on your one-sheet:

  • Release date
  • URLs for your artist site, a label site (if applicable), and those of other musicians on your album.
  • Social media info.  If you have a Twitter address, include that on your one-sheet.  Include all Twitter addresses for anyone having anything to do with your album…  musicians, PR rep, label, cover art designer, etc.  I like Twitter to promote content, and the less time I have to search down Twitter addresses, etc, the happier I am and the more likely I help spread the word about your album review.  Same goes for stuff like Facebook.

-When have you become a pest?  I’m certain that some of you have sent out email queries, not received a response, then wondered how long to wait to follow up… or, even, whether to follow up at all.  I can only speak for myself here, but my answer would be, yes, it’s okay to follow up.  A guideline, let’s say, no sooner than 3 weeks, no later than 6.  Just a simple sentence, politely stated, asking if I’ve had a chance to listen to your music.  You’re not being a pest.  It’s not an inconvenience for me, and, hell, sometimes it’s helpful for me as a reminder.

Helpful Hint:  When you send the follow-up email, do it by responding to your initial query… that way I’m getting your info and the links to your music in the same email asking me the status of the review.  It’ll make it more convenient for me to have your music/info in front of me and not have to track it down in my inbox/email system.  If you’ve sent a physical CD and you’re nervous that I haven’t received it, it’s totally cool to follow up and ask.  I try to email people when I get a promo copy, but I don’t always remember or have the time.  Following up on something like that is natural.

Any more than one follow-up, though, is probably too much.  If a few months have passed, then, fine, it’s cool.  But if I’ve already told you that I’ll give your album a listen, I’m almost never going to respond to tell you, no, I can’t do anything with it.  I barely have time to listen to all the music that I receive, and I definitely don’t have enough time to provide an email about what I’ve decided… and that includes albums that I actually write a review about.  I know it might come off as rude, but my time is very scarce, and it’s gotten to where I have to make some hard decisions on what I can and can’t do.  Email correspondence often doesn’t make the cut.

-Please be nice.  But more importantly, be sincere.  Obviously, being rude in an email doesn’t score any points.  I can’t stress enough that being genuine and sincere does go a long way.  Be professional, yes, but I know the Business of Art is a tough thing… knowing what to do and how to do it, it’s not always clear cut.

And this is your album, which you’ve worked extremely hard on, and this is your career, which you’ve invested so much of yourself into… it’s difficult to switch from the intense emotional involvement of creating the music to a state of professional detachment as you try to promote it.  That’s so damn hard, and you have my sympathy.

The good thing with me is that I’m not going to look down upon you or ridicule you if you own up to not being sure if you’re doing the right thing or ask for advice or any of those things you probably don’t want to do if you’re pitching Blue Note or ECM.  It’s okay to admit that you’re unsure, and since I like to help, if I have advice to give, I’ll send it your way.  I mention this just to help, perhaps, take some of the pressure off of you when pitching a review to me.  Yes, I’ve got preferences on how I’d like a review pitch to appear, but for the most part, I’m a pretty forgiving guy.  Don’t get too intimidated by the process.  For those of you just starting out, I know how it can get.

Okay, I think I’m going to end the column here.  I was going to mention some stuff about strengthening your internet presence and maintenance of Youtube videos and Soundcloud pages, but I’ll save that for the next column.

If you have any questions, feel free to email me, though it might be nice to have you comment below, because others might have the same questions.

Cheers.